← Back to Episodes

Wondrous Wednesday 05: Quantum Non-Locality Introduction

ai-in-the-air_ww-ep-05
Download MP3

Summary

Introduction to quantum non-locality and entangled particles. Discusses EPR experiment, spin measurements, and faster-than-light correlations. Previews Bell's theorem.

Transcript

0:00 okay welcome to arts and ideas in the air under the tent around Baltimore this
0:05 is wondrous Wednesday where I talk about some particular topic of interest so
0:10 I'll try to keep it brief well it's a big topic what I want to talk about
0:14 today is called quantum non-locality so we already talked about what kind of
0:20 quantum means it's these very small things like electrons and photons and so
0:26 forth that you know have strange properties I talked about the double
0:32 slit experiment where depending on the setup particle might seem like a wave
0:39 instead of something with a definite position particles you can think of as
0:44 just like little balls moving around and so it's kind of weird to think of a ball
0:49 as kind of like an ocean wave right so that was bizarre now I did say that the
0:54 resolution of that in my opinion is boming mechanics which says there's a
0:59 wave that tells the particle how to move that's why you see wave like behavior
1:03 and you see particle like material behavior because it's actually a
1:07 particle it's it's a ball it's ball moving on an ocean no problem now that's
1:13 all fine except the interesting part in the part that kind of makes physicists
1:17 like me is involves mostly multiple particles I think there might be an
1:27 argument for one particle where there's some weirdness going on but the easiest
1:31 thing is kind of two particles kind of being related to each other and there's
1:40 something going on that allows them to communicate at speeds faster than light
1:46 now the notion of locality is that what happens here can only affect something
1:54 over there at the speed of light or less so if if what I'm doing here like I'm
2:01 record I'm talking in this microphone now if my voice was kind of
2:06 instantaneously broadcast to the Andromeda galaxy so like kind of like in
2:11 my frame of mind of now if suddenly my voice was Andromeda there that would be
2:16 considered non-local but if I'm talking this microphone and it's broadcasting
2:22 the thing into deep space and like a million years later or however far
2:27 Andromeda is I don't actually know and you know my voice among traveling along
2:35 these light waves reaches there in a million years and I was perfectly local
2:40 that's fine okay so the idea was you know you can ask is quantum mechanics
2:48 non-local now in standard physics the idea is that when you measure something
2:54 it collapses to the definite value so if you measure the position of something
2:58 it collapses to you know a definite position if you measure how fast it's
3:03 moving before that it was just moving in this strange blend of different speeds
3:09 or whatever but when you measure the speed it collapses to a single speed and
3:15 so that's kind of like instant as soon as you do the measurement this thing
3:20 happens fine good now and as it turns out when you measure the position of a
3:31 particle the speed gets uncertain it starts varying a lot if you measure the
3:37 speed of a particle its position gets very uncertain that's how quantum
3:40 mechanics works in terms of the experiments that they talk about in
3:43 measuring these things okay good now in quantum mechanics two particles can be
3:51 kind of correlated with each other so they're the behavior of the one impacts
3:56 the behavior of the other and so Einstein came up with this idea of two
4:03 particles traveling in like opposite directions and their speeds were
4:11 exactly sort of correlated and so if you you could deduce the you know the setup
4:23 is such that if you measure the position of particle a you can you can deduce
4:29 with the the the position of particle B is and if you measure the speed of
4:36 particle a you can deduce the speed of particle B and so basically that is sort
4:48 of the non-local stuff that is of question so yeah so the idea is that you
4:57 shoot these particles out one side you you know yeah you can do a position or
5:05 speed measurement and the other one it has to have it so that means the values
5:10 that measurement has to happen you know faster than speed of light if you've set
5:16 it up so that they're far enough apart that when you do this thing make this
5:20 you have to make the decision randomly far enough away that can't that decision
5:25 can't be propagated by the speed of light and so then that's what that's
5:33 what happens so so he said quantum mechanics is now on local that's a
5:40 problem unless of course the position in momentum were already known so that if
5:46 they actually existed beforehand in some fashion then you're just kind of
5:51 deducing what was already there and somehow then doing measurements breaks
5:57 his stuff and so he really wanted to find a theory where you could do that
6:02 where you could assign stuff like that now there is another kind of experiment
6:10 along these lines that allows for really interesting well so the EPR experiment
6:21 what it showed was that the standard quantum view leads to non-locality and
6:26 then this is something that physicists are reluctant to really acknowledge
6:29 because they don't really want to say that momentum and position exist and
6:35 therefore somehow collapsing and having things happen it's I don't know it's
6:42 kind of vague enough that they're like whatever they have something else they
6:46 call a non-locality condition for quantum mechanics but so goes now the
6:52 other experiment the other idea which actually was it was thought up by boom
6:59 of boming mechanics although had nothing to do with boming mechanics it was just
7:05 he had come up with this different idea so there are is another particle system
7:11 where well so there's a notion of spin so if like an electron kind of spins and
7:20 if you so you can have a magnetic field and if it spins in one direction it goes
7:24 up and spins in a different direction it goes down and you can you know so that's
7:32 just a thing however it can spin along different axes and so you can measure
7:43 you know relative to those different axes and in classical physics you know
7:51 if you're spinning and kind of pointing upwards our point pointing in one
7:57 direction you know go up or down but if your point spinning around another one
8:01 it wouldn't just go up or down in the same way it would go somewhere like in
8:06 between or something depends on exactly where it's you know how it's what it's
8:13 spinning around basically but in quantum mechanics what's found is that if you
8:18 spin if you measure it in one direction you get up or down if you measure it in
8:23 a different direction you also get an up and down for that so it's like it's
8:27 spinning around all these different axes all at the same time that's the behavior
8:32 that we see by the way the picture of it being a ball that's spinning around an
8:38 axis is completely wrong but you know the behavior is consistent with that
8:43 kind of model anyway so now there's a system where things can spin up I mean
8:50 where if this particle is found to spin up then the its partner is found to
8:54 spin down and that's true among any direction that you measure the spin
9:00 around so if it's if it's you know whatever you find on the one you know
9:04 the one on the other side so spin up spin down is how it goes and so that
9:12 allows you to measure the the spin up and spin down of these separate
9:21 particles and you know if you measure just in the one direction then you know
9:30 you can instantly say that okay this was up over here so we know it's going to be
9:35 down over there and that's what you always see good so there's a certain
9:40 sense okay yeah that should be the same right you need to have something
9:43 pre-existing somehow that determines this up and down or you need to
9:49 communicate faster than the speed of light good good so I think that's
9:58 probably enough for now but a man named John Stewart Bell comes into the
10:04 picture when he realizes who and he was inspired by this by actually reading
10:09 boming mechanics and being like oh okay that looks great but it's kind of
10:13 non-local can we get rid of this non-local thing and I'll talk more about
10:16 that later but his idea was oh measured along these different directions and
10:23 then you you you see you know you get a certain statistics from it and it turns
10:31 out that you can't actually assign some kind of underlying value scheme that
10:38 works with the quantum mechanical results I'll talk about that next time
10:42 but you can look it up if you like just look for Bell non-locality or Bell
10:50 inequality or something like that EPR Bell boom you know you'll you'll find
10:58 the good stuff anyway that's for next time thanks for listening